The Mystery of Machu Picchu
Somewhere around 1450 AD, a team of Inca stonemasons cut a block of granite, shaped it with stone hammers and bronze chisels, and fitted it against an adjacent block. They ground the two surfaces together with abrasive sand until they matched so precisely that not even a knife blade could slip between them. Then they did it again. And again. More than 150 times, for each structure in the complex.
The technique has a name — ashlar masonry. What it produces is a wall that can flex slightly under seismic load without cracking, because there's no mortar to fracture. Machu Picchu sits in one of Peru's most seismically active zones. The city has survived dozens of earthquakes that would have reduced a mortared structure to rubble. Whatever else you think about the Inca, they understood their environment.
The Place
Machu Picchu occupies a narrow saddle between two Andean peaks — Machu Picchu mountain and Huayna Picchu — at 7,970 feet above sea level, about 80 kilometers northwest of Cusco. The Urubamba River curves around it in a horseshoe far below, the surrounding valley dropping steeply away on three sides. The site is not visible from the valley floor, which is part of why it remained largely unknown to the outside world until 1911.
Built in the mid-15th century under the Inca emperor Pachacuti, Machu Picchu was a royal estate and religious retreat — not, as the dramatic nickname "Lost City of the Incas" implies, a major urban center. Population estimates range from a few hundred to perhaps a thousand people at peak occupancy. The city has over 150 structures: temples, residences, terraced agricultural fields, fountains, and drainage systems. Its layout is sophisticated enough that runoff from the agricultural terraces feeds the fountain system, which feeds the drainage canals — a closed loop of water management on a steep mountainside.
The site was abandoned after the Spanish conquest — not discovered by the Spanish, apparently, but simply left. Local communities in the valley below knew it existed. Hiram Bingham, the Yale historian who publicized it to the outside world in 1911, was guided there by a local farmer.
Reaching Machu Picchu requires a train from Cusco to Aguas Calientes, followed by a bus (or a hike) up the mountain. Daily visitor numbers are limited by permit, and advance booking is essential. The Inca Trail approach, a 4-day hike through mountain terrain, is one of the great long-distance treks in the world, but requires permits booked months in advance.
What the Show Claims
Ancient Aliens addressed Machu Picchu in Season 3, Episode 4, Season 11, Episode 4, and Season 17, Episode 1.
The mortar-free stonework is the show's primary focus. Stones fitted without mortar to the precision of sub-millimeter tolerances, the theorists argue, cannot be produced by Inca technology — stone hammers and bronze chisels, the show claims, are simply not capable of this kind of result. The implication is that alien tools or techniques were employed.
Season 11 adds a specific claim: ground-penetrating radar surveys of the site detected anomalies beneath the structure, which the show presents as possible hidden chambers containing ancient technology or alien artifacts. The anomalies, the episode suggests, might be the key to understanding why Machu Picchu was built where and how it was.
The Intihuatana stone — a carved granite pillar at the high point of the ceremonial district — receives significant attention in Season 17. The show's theorists argue it functioned as an alien astronomical instrument, capable of capturing solar energy or serving as a communication device for beings in the sky. The name itself ("hitching post of the sun") is presented as evidence that the structure was used to literally anchor celestial bodies or spacecraft.
The site's location is also cited: Machu Picchu sits at a point where, the show claims, specific electromagnetic properties of the Earth make it a power node — a location chosen deliberately for its energetic characteristics.
What Archaeology Says
The mortar-free precision has been directly studied by architect and archaeologist John Rowe and, more recently, by the Getty Conservation Institute's ongoing work at the site. The conclusion: the Inca achieved this precision through a technique of grinding stone surfaces against each other using abrasive compounds — essentially lapping, the same process used in precision manufacturing but done by hand with sand. It's time-consuming, requires skilled workers, and produces exactly the kind of tight fit seen at Machu Picchu. Tool marks consistent with this process are visible under examination.
The earthquake-resistance properties appear to be intentional. Studies of Inca construction techniques by civil engineer Ken Wright have documented that Inca builders systematically built on bedrock, used drainage to prevent soil saturation, and designed wall geometries that distribute seismic loads. Machu Picchu's 60% drainage infrastructure (invisible below the surface) is the result of deliberate engineering choices. The walls' slight inward lean — technically called "battering" — increases stability under lateral loads.
The ground-penetrating radar anomalies detected in Season 11 are real — GPR surveys do show subsurface features — but these are consistent with archaeological features (drainage channels, foundation stones, buried walls) rather than mysterious chambers. Archaeological investigation has not revealed anything inconsistent with standard Inca construction at these locations.
The Intihuatana is a solar calendar. Its specific geometry captures the sun at specific points in its annual cycle, including the zenith passage — when the sun is directly overhead at Cusco's latitude — and the solstices. The "hitching post" name reflects a metaphor: the sun is "tied" to its turning point to prevent it from continuing south. It's one of the few surviving examples (many were deliberately destroyed by Spanish missionaries) of this type of Inca solar observatory.
The electromagnetic location claims have not been supported by physical measurement at the site. The specific energy patterns claimed by the show have not been independently verified.
The Verdict
What Machu Picchu genuinely still offers to archaeologists is the question of intent at the level of a specific person.
We know Pachacuti built it — there is textual evidence from Spanish colonial documents describing the royal estate and its ownership. What we don't fully understand is why this location was chosen. The site is remote, difficult to access, and required enormous logistical effort to supply. It's also, from the ridge, spectacular — surrounded by cloud and mountain in a way that would have been meaningful within Inca cosmology.
The Inca concept of huaca — sacred place, understood as a location where the divine is immanent in the physical landscape — applies to mountains, rivers, rock formations, and confluences. Machu Picchu's position at a mountain confluence, surrounded by peaks considered sacred, within sight of the Urubamba's sacred bend, may explain the location in terms that don't require alien assistance but do require a different framework than modern Western geography.
What would it mean to build your estate at a place where the divine and physical worlds interpenetrate? That's the question Pachacuti seems to have been answering. The stones are still there. The question is still open.
Track the 1 site from this post on your map.
Free account · mark visited sites · build your bucket list.
Start tracking